SUBJECT: Should a city try to preserve its old, historic building or destroy them and replace them with modern buildings? Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion. PR형입니다.
Given the choice between city preserving its old, historic buildings and destroying them and replacing them with modern buildings, I would choose preserving its old, historic buildings.
본론1과 2의 구분이 명확하게 하시구요,
First of all, older buildings preserve the distinctiveness of the historic period in which they were constructed and they are a reminder of the past too. In other words, they add diversity to the scenery of a town and we can feel the sense of history for residents. For example, When I went on a tour to Europe where we can see lots of historical buildings such as 세가지 정도 예를 들어주세요, and cultures , almost all the old buildings were very well preserved because of the city's strict laws ??? 불필요한 내용이 안되려면 자세한 설명이 필요합니다. 역사깊은 건물들을 보면서 무엇을 알게되었는지도 자세히 쓰시면 좋겠어요. However <- 이 에세이의 문제는 PR형입니다. 그러니 님이 선택하신 옛날건물 보존에 대한 이유를 본론1,2에 쓰시는 겁니다. 그런데 글의 전개는 CC형으로 되어있네요, 논지이탈입니다. 논지이탈은 점수받기 힘듭니다., in addition to replacing historic buildings with modern building is not only means of continued progress because it can be just as functional as modern buildings or interiors can be renovated to meet current needs. Suppose we really destroy the older building , we can spend less money to rehabilitate and remodel them to build a new structure.
All things considered , between preserve old buildings and destroy them and replace them with modern buildings , it is better to preserve old buildings for the reasons I have discussed above.