The reading passage states that the evidence found is thought to be available to support that it is a statue of Julius Caesar; however, the listening passage refutes this idea by providing several counterexamples.
To begin with, the writer asserts that features correspond to appearance. To be specefic, wrinkles, chin, and hairline is similar and people were able to confirm identity immedi. Conversely, the lecture contradicts this idea by stating that there is no reason to suppose resembles. Those features do not look like contemp.images.
Furthermore, the author contends that area is connected very close. Arles established colony and people commissioned in his honor. In contrast, the speaker belies this claim by stating that Arles does not have any special connect. Specifically, Nero set up colonies being considered true founder.
Moreover, the passage claims that the material used in statue is the clue. The statue was made of rare and expensive white marble. It was told not to be used for other than ruler. On the contrary, the lecturer rebuts this point by stating that marble was utilized just for rulers. As artists and ptrons highly valued them, wealthy individual would pay for stone.
Fair: 17~23
점수; 20
통합형 에세이에 비해서 너무 설명이 부족한 거 같습니다. 통합형 에세이에서 가장 중요하게 보여주는 것 중에 하나는 한 주제에 대하여서 서로 다른 정보를 가진 리딩과 리스닝이 얼마나 적절하게 잘 비교하고 있는 가를 보는 것이 통합형 에세이에서 가장 중요한 거 같습니다. 하지만 지금 이 에세이 같은 경우에는 리딩이나 리스닝 둘 다 설명이 너무 부족합니다. 좀 더 구체적으로 어떤 부분에서 서로 비교하고 반박하는 지를 서술해 주시길 바랍니다. 수고많으셧습니다.