▶ Your Answer :
The reading
passage states that congestion pricing system gives significant benefits in
many ways; however, the listening passage refutes this idea by providing
several counterexamples.
To begin
with, the writer asserts that congestion pricing system makes driving much
safer. A reduction in the volume of the traffic results to a decrease in the
number of accidents. Additionally, it is attributable to the sharp drop in
traffic. Conversely, the lecture contradicts this idea by stating that
accidents that occur by having less cars on the road are more severe. The lack
of traffic makes it possible for vehicles to drive at much higher speeds. A 30
percent increase in speed more than doubles the risk of serious injury.
Furthermore,
the author contends that congestion pricing system results in a city’s public
transportation and network becoming more convenient to use. With a lower number
of vehicles on the road, buses are able to stay on schedule. In contrast, the
professor belies this claim by stating that public transportation becomes less
convenient. If many people try to ride public transportations, the capacity
will be exceeded.
Lastly,
the passage claims that congestion pricing system gives positive impact on
business within a city. Because traffic congestion causes excessive fuel
consumption. It combined total of 13 dollars each year due to the extra of
operating in a city. On the contrary, the lecturer rebuts this point by stating
that congestion pricing system prevents people from coming to the city. The
company experiences a significant decline in revenue. In London, many
businessmen mentioned that they could not earn a lot of money due to congestion
pricing system.
In
conclusion, while the text maintains that congestion pricing system is
beneficial, the professor challenges these points by stating a few opposing
examples.
|