▶ Your Answer :
The
reading passage contends that a brain scan lie detector is more accurate than
the conventional polygraph. On the other hand, the lecturer brings up several
points that contradict this argument.
First,
the lecturer claims that true statements can be misidentified by the brain scan san
lie detector. This is because when people tell about a sensitive topic, they
use the same part of the brain as they lie. This counters the reading passage’s
claim that the detector does not misidentify the statements which are is true. reading 내용을 단순히 '진실인 설명을 오해하지 않는다'라고만 정리하면 조금 어색한 것 같아요. '뇌를 스캔하기 때문에' 오류가 없다거나 등등 좀 더 detail이 필요해 보입니다. (지문을 모르는 상태에서 추측한 것이니 실제 지문과 대조하면서 판단해주세요~)
Next,
the lecturer argues that there is still need for a subjective analysis to
interpret the results. This is because there are no standard criteria when
people analyze the test. This casts doubt on the reading passage’s claim that the results
of the brain scan detector can be interpreted by using an objective manner.
Finally,
the lecturer points out that there are some ways to trick the test. For
example, complex mental process can increase the brain activity to mask lies. Also,
neutral activities 키워드가 조금 어색해 보이는데 지문 체크해보시면 좋을 것 같아요. can deceive the detector and the results can be interpreted as
being honesty. This refutes the reading passage’s claim that to intentionally
trick the test will be much harder because the detector scans the brain
activity.
Comment : 전반적으로 내용을 간결하게 잘 요약해주신 것 같습니다. 다만 제가 실제 지문을 모르는 상태에서 요약문의 흐름을 보고 판단한 내용이니 실제 문제에서 출제된 lecture내용과 reading내용을 다시 한 번 점검해보시면서 빠진 내용이나 잘못 파악된 내용은 없는지 검토해주시기 바랍니다. 수고 많으셨습니다~!
Integrated Writing Rubrics Score 4/5 A response at this level is generally good in selecting the important information from the lecture and in coherently and accurately presenting this information in relation to the relevant information in the reading, but it may have minor omission, inaccuracy, vagueness, or imprecision of some content from the lecture or in connection to points made in the reading. A response is also scored at this level if it has more frequent or noticeable minor language errors, as long as such usage and grammatical structures do not result in anything more than an occasional lapse of clarity or in the connection of ideas.
|