▶ Your Answer :
Both of the author of the reading passage and the lecturer are talking about the function of Great Zimbabwe. The author proposes three possible functions, and the lecturer casts doubt on the hypotheses for three reasons. First of all, the lecturer points out that it is unlikely to believe that the site was used as a defensive fortress. This is because there was no permanent source of water in the fortress. If the site had been a defensive fortress, it must have been essential to prepare water source. Moreover, no defensive structure was discovered in and near the site. This counters the author's argument that the site was served as a defensive fortress. (수동태, 오탈자 주의) Next, the speaker argues that there is no reason to think that the site was a palace for royal family. The phrase 'Dzima Woye' is known to imply venerated houses. The thing is, However, the phrase does not indicate anything about royalty. In addition, the fact that up to 2,000 people are supposed to have lived in the site suggests the hypothesis that the site was a full size city. This contradicts the author's claim that it was a palace for royal family. The final statement made by the speaker is that the site was not intended to be constructed as a religious center. According to the speaker, there is a compelling non religious feature. The king, not a religious leader, wished to summon at the cave. He amplified his voice using the valley in the cave. This refutes the author's statement that the site served as a religious center.
Writing 0–30 score scale: Limited (1-16) / Fair (17-23) / Good (24–30)
ADDRESSING TOPIC
|
ORGANIZATION
|
PROGRESSION AND COHERENCE
|
LANGUAGE USE
|
GRAMMAR
|
LIMITED
|
FAIR
|
FAIR
|
FAIR
|
FAIR
|
각 카테고리별 SCORE: LIMITED / FAIR / GOOD
|
- wasn't --> was not 처럼 full version으로 작성해주세요. |