▶ Your Answer :
The reading passage gives ample support for the claim that congestion pricing is beneficial in many ways. However, the professor in the lecture suggests three reasons as a rebuttal. First, the professor contends that congestion pricing causes more serious accidents. Since there are less cars in the road, (Why's that?) the drivers tend to drive at a higher speed, which and it leads to more serious accidents. According to a study in 2013, the number of accidents doubled when speed had increased 30 percent. This casts doubt on reading passage’s claim that congestion pricing can lower the number of accidents because there is less volume of traffic. Second, the professor asserts that congestion pricing can cause inconvenience of to using transportation. If more people try to use public transportation, it will exceed its capacity eventually. Therefore, people might have to wait to catch a bus. This counters the reading passage’s suggestion that transportation would be more convenient to use due to congestion pricing Finally, the professor claims that congestion pricing gives a negative impact on business. Shoppers have to drive into a city to buy products, but if there is congestion pricing is implemented, less customers will visit the city. In fact, retailers in city which has congestion pricing complained that the number of customer had reduced because of congestion pricing. (Awkward sentence) This reputes the reading passage’s opinion that congestion pricing has a positive influence on city business.
채점기준표 | Grammar | Contents | Example | Coherence | 점수 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 | Score | Fair 19-22 | - 문장의 표현이 어색하거나 명료하지 않습니다.
- 큰 맥락은 잘 잡힌 편이지만, 각 단락의 세부 내용들이 다소 누락되어 있어요. 충분히 채워줄 수 있도록 해주세요.
|
|