▶ Your Answer :
Some people claim the use of old and historic building have some usage in aspects of educational values and cultural representative. However, in the modern world there are lot of consideration you have to account on. Moreover, most of the cases show that there are bigger benefits in destroying the old one and building a new one, in terms of economic value and establishing cities infrastructure.
First of all, building a new structure has greater economic impacts rather than preserving the old one. In other words, a city could make better use of the area by reconstruction. Regarding to the traits of a historical building, which is located at geographically important sectors, the area has extreme financial potential. For example, ancient palaces are usually at the dead center of the main street. Also, the surroundings are flourished by lucrative merchants building and significant institutions. To be specific, Gung-Bok Palace which is the prime historical building in South Korea, occupies the most valuable location in Asia. if the city starts to destroy the building and develop it into other economically efficient structure, the city could gain massive monetary advantages. Furthermore, the city could spend this extra revenue into citizens welfare. Hence, all of economic entity could earn some benefits.
Second, destroying a old structures is helpful to establishing cities' infrastructures. Reserving historic buildings follows with implementing numerous laws and regulations, which is the main factor hindering the development of the cities infrastructure. Such as water pipe, gas reserve, or powerplants cannot be placed in the area near by the historical building due to the regulations. Even though the plant facility does not is not directly adjacent with the old building, it still might get forbidden. This interrupts the process of elaborating a city's basic infrastructure. For instance, in Paris, subways systems are tangled up with a random order. This happened due to the regulation which forced the constructors to detour every single historical buildings. Not only that, but also until early 20 Century, the city's electricity system is very vulnerable and hard to fix. This is mainly because the electric lines are mingled all around old buildings so that it is hard to detect actually location where the problem occurred. In other words, it causes severe problems involving inconvenience.
For these reasons, I believe that city government should destroy and build a new building. This is not only lucrative, but also improve the basic system how the city efficiently works. Our descendants could enjoy the juice of the decision.
| 채점기준표 | Grammar | Contents | Example | Coherence | 점수 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | Score | Fair 17-20 | - spelling error가 많아, 글의 전반적인 흐름에 상당한 방해가 됩니다. 반드시 정확한 단어로 서술하여 주세요.
|
|