■ Direction You have 20 minutes to plan and write your response. You response will be judge on the basis of The quality of writing and on how well your response presents the points in the lecture and the relationship to the reading passage. Typically, an effective response will be 150 to 225 words. ■ Question Summarize the points made in the lecture you just heard, explaining how they cast doubt on the points made in the reading
|
|
|
▶ Topic :
Reading : Biopolymer is better than traditional plastic in some ways. Lecture : Benefits of biopolymer are in question. |
|
|
|
The professor cast doubts on the reading passage's idea that the biopolymers which is environmental friendly plastic is a great solution to the ecological problem. The professor says that biopolymer's benefits are still in question.
First of all, the professor claims that biopolymer is not a great alternative for traditional plastic. According to the reading, biopolymer is less harmful to the environment because it disintegrates easily and emits less pollution using . However, the professor says that it is overstated because biopolymer needs a specific environment to be disintegrated easily.
On top of that, the professor assaults that biopolymer is not as beneficial to the environment as people may think. According to the reading, biopolymer is very sustainable and not jeopardize our future generatoin environment. However the professor says that biopolymer needs a lot of natural crops like corn, potatoes and wheat to produce and it can be very devastate for agricultural environment.
Finally, the professor rebuts the idea that biopolymer is as effective as traditional plastic. According to the reading, biopolymer is already proven to be as sturdy as traditional plastic in the market. However, the professor says that the effectiveness of biopolymer is not proven yet.