▶ Your Answer : The lecturer argues that the hypotheses for the cause of TLPs have insufficient evidence. This contradicts the passage's claim that TLPs, the changes of the color on Moon's surface, have a number of possible causes. First, the lecturer asserts that the theory of lunar gas causing the TLPs is unreliable. This is because craters are so frequently seen, and therefore it is not a surprise that the TLPs are often observed along with the craters. In addition, the lecturer explains that the probe sent by NASA shows an inconsiderable amount of gas emitted. This contradicts the passage's claim that clouds of lunar gas caused the creation of TLPs. Next, the lecturer contends that there is no indication for huge dust clouds. In fact, there was only a small amount of dust that might not have affected the Moon's surface at all. To support this idea, the lecturer says that the astronauts from Apollo found that the flat rock surfaces on Moon were actually composed of fine dust particles. This casts doubts on the passage's claim that TLPs are made out of dust clouds. Lastly, the lecturer claims that the solar flare theory is likely to be false. Since the dates at which the TLPs were observed and the dates at which the solar flares were detected do not match, it is possible that there is no correlation between solar flare and TLPs. This opposes the reading passage's claim that TLPs are caused by the radiation on Moon's surface.
Good: 24~30 점수:24 리딩에 대한 정보가 많이 부족한 통합형 에세이인거 같습니다. 통합형 에세이에서 가장 중요하게 차지하는 것 중에 하나는 한 주제에 대하여서 서로 다른 정보를 가진 리딩과 리스닝이 어떻게 적절하게 비교하고 있는 지를 알아 보는 것 입니다. 지금 이 에세이 같은 경우에는 리스닝에 대한 정보는 충분하게 잘 전달 되고 있으나. 리딩에 대한 정보는 한 문장으로만 서술 되어 있습니다. 따라서 리스닝을 좀 더 반박 할 수 있는 리딩의 정보를 더 서술하는 것 이 좋을 거 같습니다. 수고많으셨습니다. |