▶ Your Answer :
According to the lecture, there are
actually no advantages that occur from congestion pricing. This contradicts the
reading’s claim that congestion pricing offers significant benefits. In
the lecture, the speaker asserts that congestion pricing does not make driving
safer. It actually increases the severity of the accident. This is evidenced by
a research in Australia, which found that 30% of less traffic increases the
severity by more than 2 times because cars can drive faster when there is less
traffic. This rebuffs the reading’s claim that congestion pricing makes driving
safer due to the decrease in the number of cars.
In
the lecture, the speaker says that congestion pricing makes public
transportation less convenient in the long term. This is because there will be
more people using public transportation. For example, people have to wait
longer for a bus that has enough space for new people. This causes discomfort
in the long term. This counters the reading’s claim that congestion pricing
makes city’s transportation network more convenient to use due to decrease in
cars and buses. Lastly,
the speaker argues that congestion pricing does not help local business. Local
business said that their income decreased significantly because the shoppers do
not drive to their shops due to congestion pricing. This challenges the reading’s
claim that congestion pricing has a positive impact on business because traffic
congestion makes business lose money.
Good: 24~30 점수: 24 리딩에 대한 정보가 많이 빈약한 통합형 에세이인거 같습니다. 통합형 에세이에서 가장 중요하게 보는 것 중에 하나가 한 주제에 대하여서 서로 다른 정보를 가진 리딩과 리스닝이 서로 어떻게 잘 비교하고 있는 지를 보는 것 입니다. 지금 이 에세이 같은 경우는 리스닝에 대한 정보는 부족함 없이 잘 설명하고 있지만 리딩에 대한 정보는 한 문장으로만 서술되고 있습니다. 따라서 리스닝을 좀 더 반박 할 수 있는 부분들을 더 서술해주시길 바랍니다. 수고많으셨습니다.
|