▶ Your Answer :
The reading passage contends that the Lascoon is actually a forgery carried out by Michelangelo by three reasons. On the contrary, the speaker in the lecture brings up several points that make a counterargument to the reading.
First of all, the reading passage maintains that Michelangelo might have forged the Laocoon was to fool his rival, Giuliano da Sangallo. However, the lecturer refutes on this reading's assertion that Michelangelo was not forged the Laocoon. Because Sangallo was his friend, not a rival, he did not invite Michelangelo to trick.
Next, according to the reading, the Laocoon resembles strikly to a figure in Michelangelo's painting. In contrary, the speaker in the lecture casts doubt on this reason in the reading that there is not any similarityon those.
The final point made by the reading is that the forgery was a common and accepted artistic parctice during the age of Renaissance. On the contrast, it is accentuated in the lecture that it is not athentic though forgery is true for replication. It is different to forgery to make people tricked, and reality for forgery is an extreme case.
점수: 28 지적할 부분이 없는 통합형 에세이입니다. 통합형 에세이에서 가장 중요한 부분을 차지하는 것 중에 하나는 한 주제에 대하여서 서로 다른 정보를 가지고 있는 리딩과 리스닝이 어떻게 비교하고 반박을 하는 것인지를 보는 것 입니다. 지금 이 에세에같은 경우에 있어서는 리딩이나 리스닝 둘 다 서로 필요한 부분만 전달해주는 거 같습니다. 한 주제에 대하여서 서로 무엇을 말하려고 하는 것인지를 알 수 있었던 에세이엿습니다. 수고많으셨습니다.
|