▶ Your Answer :
Both of the given lecture and the article
are about tamarisk beetle. The author of the reading passage explains three
negative factors of the tamarisk beetle, a type of insect that feeds on the
tamarisk tree, aren’t helpful for eradicating. However, the professor in the
lecture counters all three arguments and the reading passage is unreliable.
Firstly,
the article states that controlling the spread of the tamarisk beetle is
difficult. However, the lecture disregards this theory by pointing out that it doesn’t
go where tamarisk tree is absence, since tamarisk beetle only eat this tree. Furthermore,
he adds as it has many predators, spread of the tamarisk beetle is quite
controllable.
Secondly,
the reading argues long time and large amounts of water will be spent to kill
the one. The professor refutes this point by suggesting tamarisk beetles
immediately impact on the tree’s death. Moreover, since these beetles consume
all of leaves, it prohibits the process of photosynthesis, converting from sunlight
to energy. By reducing this process, it decreases the bulk of plants water use.
The
last point made in the reading passage contends that tamarisk beetles trigger the
risk of wildfires. However, the lecturer casts skepticism on this claim by
pointing out that the threat of wildfires made by beetles isn’t that severe, because
government agency keeps managing the potential wildfires area.
점수: 22 리딩에 대한 정보가 많이 부족한 통합형 에세이입니다. 통합형 에세이에서 가장 중요한 부분을 차지하는 것은 한 주제에 대하여서 서로 다른 정보를 가지고 있는 리딩과 리스닝이 어떻게 비교하고 반박을 하는 것인지를 보는 것 입니다. 지금 이 에세이 같은 경우는 리딩에 대한 부분을 각 단락에서 한 문장으로만 서술하였는데. 한 문장으로 끝내는 것 보다는 리스닝을 좀 더 반박할 수 있는 부분들을 더 서술하시길 바랍니다. 수고많으셨습니다.
|