▶ Your Answer :
The reading passage contends that Etruscan civilization
might came from Turkey with high possibilities. However, the lecturer brings up
several points which contradict this argument.
First, the speaker argues that the result
of ancient DNA investigation cannot be a plausible evidence. There are lots of
chances that ancient DNA was damaged, or contaminated over long periods. This
casts doubt on the reading passage which states DNA analysis of Etruscan
gravesites is a scientific proof of link between Etruscans and ancient Turks.
Also, according to the lecturer, the
similarity of alphabets between two civilizations could hardly explain the theory.
There are a bulk of different languages which resemble with each other by
chance. This refutes the reading passage’s assertion that some studies which found
the Etruscan inscriptions and bilingual texts have common feature with Turkish strengthens
the theory.
Final point made by lecturer is that,
although Turks have same funerary culture, it doesn’t link two civilizations
with each other. Cremation was performed long before the Etruscan settled at
the region. That means, the Etruscan might just be a successor of local region.
Yet no other groups in northern Italy had same culture, this counters the
writer’s claim that sharing identical funerary practices is another evidence.
점수: 22 리딩에 대한 정보가 많이 부족한 통합형 에세이입니다. 통합형 에세이에서 가장 중요한 부분을 차지하는 것은 한 주제에 대하여서 서로 다른 정보를 가지고 있는 리딩과 리스닝이 어떻게 비교하고 반박을 하는 것인지를 보는 것 입니다. 지금 이 에세이 같은 경우에 있어서는 리딩에 대한 부분을 각 단락에서 한 문장으로만 서술하였습니다. 한 문장으로 끝내는 것 보다는 리스닝을 좀 더 반박할 수 있는 부분들을 더 서술하시길 바랍니다. 수고많으셨습니다.
|