▶ Your Answer :
The writer of the reading passage and professor in the lecturer discuss whether the two orcas are the same one. The passage explains that those whales are completely different creatures while the professor raises specific counterclaims and points out why they are identical. To begin with, the lecturer argues that under the different circumstances. Such as the amount of sunlight that they have been exposed, could make them seem different, indicating that two killer whales are indeed, one. This is in complete opposition to the point made in the reading passage, stating that two whales are different beings because their different colors. Furthermore, the second assertion, that distance between two were too far which the whales actually can swim is refuted by the lecturer. He explains that there are two types of this animal – hunting and fishing -, and the latter species are able to move 2000 miles. So 15,000 miles doesn't matter for them. This is why the lecturer contradicts the second point of the reading passage. Finally, regarding for the last point about measuring age by their size, the writer of the reading passage argues that both of them had similar size a nonsense because of the time gap between them. However, the lecturer contends that knowing their age by their size is misconception because whales stop growing after 20 years.
점수: 27 지적할 부분이 없는 통합형 에세이입니다. 통합형 에세이에서 가장 중요한 부분을 차지하는 것은 한 주제에 대하여서 서로 다른 정보를 가지고 있는 리딩과 리스닝이 어떻게 비교하고 반박을 하는 것인지를 보는 것 입니다. 지금 이 에세이 같은 경우에 있어서는 리딩이나 리스닝 둘 다 구체적으로 자신의 주장들을 잘 보여주고 있습니다. 구체적 설명들을 통하여서 자신들의 견해가 무엇인지 잘 파악할 수 있었던 독립형 에세이입니다. 수고많으셨습니다. |