▶ Your Answer : Some people think that direct advertising toward children is not bad and they can not stop because that advertising have freedom of expression.I agree to that freedom,too. However,I believe that direct advertising toward children of 2-5 years age is not good and it should not be allowed for following reasons. First of all, children can not distiguish to bad advertising and good advertising. Children of 2-5 years old is so young and they can not think deeply, so they accept natually.The children have wrong perpectives and that give some effect to children's life.For example, I was 5 years old, I watched some direct advertising of toy and I wanted so much that toy and have wrong think that girl color is pink and boy's color is blue.So, I thought strange,when my friend ,who girl,like blue or wored some blue cloet.I did know that behavior what leanrn in direct advertings is wrong, Today I change that think and I am so embrrased that. Therefore,I disagree direct advertising toword young chilren. In this regard, they does not have ability to distinguish bad advertising. Second,direct advertising make young kid's parent to spend unnecessary money. Direct adverting show some toy or things for young children who do not have deeply think.So,they talk their mother and father to buy that and their parents say no,they cry with loud voice.Then thier parent buy that because they make their children to stop crying and they spend unnecessary pay that use other valuable thing in stead. In this regard,parent spend unnecessary money because of direct advertising toward children of 2-5 years old. To sum up,I believe that direct advertising toward chlidren of 2-5 years old is not good and it should not be allowed.First,children can not distinguish to bad adverting and good advertising and that make childen to have wrong perspective.Furthermore, direct advertising make young children's parent to spend unnecessary money.Consequently,the importance of my view cannot underetimated for some reasons that I mentioned above.
|