▶ Your Answer :
According to the reading, the writer mentioned that congestion pricing
is highly beneficial in various ways. However, the lecturer argued that it
actually does not doesn’t really benefit people and businesses.
The lecturer contended that this system is not effective in making traffic
safer. The reading passage stated that less volume of traffic helped decrease
the number of car accidents by 10 percent in seven-month trial period of this
system in Stockholm. In contrast, the lecturer mentioned a 2013 report that
when fewer cars are on the road the speed of the vehicles increases and
consequently affects the death rate from car accidents to increase also.
Also, he argued that the system does not doesn’t make public transportation
more comfortable. The reading said that because of drop in traffic congestion,
it will be more convenient to use public transportations. But the lecturer said
that the writer did not didn’t consider the increase in number of people who use public
transportations due to the congestion pricing system. When more people use the
limited public transportations, people will feel discomfort instead of
convenience.
Finally, the professor said that this system gives negative impact
on businesses in the city. According to the reading, the writer stated that
businesses in the city will benefit from the low traffic which will help
delivering goods faster. On the other hand, the lecturer argued that this is
not good for retail business because it deters shoppers from driving into the
city.
Good (26–30)
-축약형 지양해주세요. doesn't-->does not, didn't-->did not
내용 정리 좋습니다. 문법도 괜찮습니다.
수고하셨습니다~~ |