▶ Your Answer : The reading passage and the listening discuss the topic of globalization. However, their perspectives are different. The reading argues that the advantages of globalization far outweigh the disadvantages of that, while the professor in the listening disagrees and says otherwise. Frist, the passage states that people can get more opportunities to have a great job. To prove this point, the reading provides that workers can gain more money in foreign firms. On the other hand, the listening debunks the claim by stating that it is better to have an occupation in local areas. The professor also provides an example, saying that there can be a decrease in a local factory when most people get their job in foreign companies. Second, the reading further describes that workers can learn new skills in foreign companies. According to the writer, globalization can make people learn education cheaper. However, the listening contradicts by saying that it can be harmful to some companies. He explains it in detail: good accessibility can make copy easily. Finally, the reading contends that it is helpful to consumers. The passage asserts that they can buy high-quality goods while many companies are competing to produce things due to globalization. Once again, the listening argues the claims by stressing that globalization cannot always make people choose the cheapest product because there are a lot of tax on income foreign goods. |