▶ Topic :
In this set of issues, the reading passage and the
speaker discuss several aspects of whether T. rex was a scavenger. The speaker
argues that the assertions made in the reading passage are just wrong. This
casts doubt on the reading passage's claim that some evidence proves that T.
rex was a scavenger.
First, in response to the reading, the speaker
insists that T. rex's teeth indicate it was a predator. Specifically
explaining, T. rex had dull teeth but it was just for chewing its food. The
important thing is that it had sharp teeth which is only found in predators. T.
rex used this teeth to capture live prey. This refutes the reading passage's
claim that teeth proves that T. rex was a scavenger.
Second, the speaker challenges the reading by
stating that brain structure is not an evidence that T. rex was a scavenger.
This is because sense of smell is not only crucial for a scavenger but also for
a predator. In details, they used sense of smell to locate prey. This
contradicts the reading passage's argument that brain structure is an evidence
that it was a scavenger.
Lastly, the speaker contends that small eyes do
not mean it was a scavenger. The reason is that size of eyes are not critical.
The direction of eyes is actually more important. T. rex saw the object with
same eyes, and it was called depth perception. T. rex used its eyes to strike
the prey. This opposes the reading passage's claim that small eyes are common in
scavengers.
In conclusion, the speaker challenges the reading
passage's claim on account of reasons stated above.
Good (24-25)
두번째 본문 -모음 앞에는 a-->an -brain structure과 sense of smell이 어떤 연관성이 있는지 정보 추가해주세요.
두번째 본문 내용 정리 더 디테일하게 해주셔야 내용 이해가 용이해집니다.
수고하셨습니다~~ |