▶ Your Answer : In the reading there is ample support for that the lambeosaurus would have used distinctive features in many ways (밑 내용을 봤을 때 distinctive feature보다는 crest를 사용했을 거 다라고 하시는 것이 좋을 거 같아요). However, the professor in the lecture gives several reasons as a rebuttal to author’s points. First, the professor in the lecture contends that lambeosaurus would have attracted their mates with their behavior not by using the crests. He mentions crocodiles as an example. The crocodiles, an reptile, lift their head and make noises to find their mates. According to that the Professor believes that lambeosaurus would have similar attract tactics with crocodiles. This refutes the author’s claim that female lambeosaurus prefer much bigger crests and the crests could have used as a method of attracting. to attract other mates. Second, the professor insists that the fossils of lambeosaurus shows many evidences. The crests of lambeosaurus is too fregile fragile and hollow compared with the crests of triceratops which is used to combats. Also he mentions that the crests of the lambeosaurus would not have used in combats because it’s crests are protruded in backward. this counter the author’s suggestion that the lambeosurus might have used their crests to depend themselves and have used as a weapon. Finally, the professor argues that the crests would not have provided air. This is because the size of the lambeosaurus was too big that comparably small crests could not have afforded enough air to them. He saids said that they would have just took a deep breath. This casts doubt to the author’s point that they might have used their heads to submerge thanks to their hollow crests. Good: 24~30 점수: 25 대채로 대립되는 리딩과 리스닝을 적절하게 잘 비교하였습니다. 하지만 문제가 되는것은 인트로에서 리딩의 주제를 명확하게 구분 안하신것이랑 문법적 오류들입니다. 제가 참석한 부분을 보시고 고쳐주시길 바랍니다. 대채로는 리딩과 리스닝에 대한 충분한 정보가 많았기에 높은 점수를 받을 수 잇을 거 같습니다. 수고많으셨습니다. |