■ Direction You have 20 minutes to plan and write your response. Your response will be judged on the basis of The quality of writing and on how well your response presents the points in the lecture and the relationship to the reading passage. Typically, an effective response will be 150 to 225 words. ■ Question Summarize the points made in the lecture you just heard, explaining how they cast doubt on the points made in the reading
|
|
|
▶ Topic :The Formation of the Mima Mounds |
|
|
▶ Your Answer : In the reading passage, there is ample support for the author’s claim
that how the Mima Mounds were formed. However, the professor in the lecture
gives several reasons as a rebuttal of the author’s point.
First, the professor contends that Mima Mounds weren’t formed by the
sediment which was brought by the wind. Also Mima mounds were too large to be
carried. If the wind produces this structure, they have to be irregular but
Mima Mounds were completely round. This casts doubt on the author’s assertion
that Mima mounds were made by the sediment that was carried by the wind.
Next, the professor argues/ insists that Mima Mounds weren’t formed by
melting glaciers. Glaciers should be made in circumstances including heavy snow
or cold temperature during the summer. But, the Mima Mounds were found in wide
variety of regions. Mexico and South Western United States were given as the
example of the place where never have glaciers but which has mounds. This
refutes the author’s suggestion that the Mima Mounds was formed by the melting
glacier.
Fair: 17~23 점수: 18 통합형 에세이에서 가장 적합하지 않는 에세이인 거 같습니다. 통합형 에세이에서 는 기본적으로 세가지 이유가 나옵니다. 이 세가지 이유에서 리딩과 리스닝이 어떻게 서로 비교하는 지를 알아가는 것이 통합형 에세이에서 점수를 기준하는 가장 중요한 부분입니다. 하지만 지금 이 에세이는 두 개만 나오는 거기 때문에 적절치 않는 거 같습니다. 한 이유가 빠진거 같습니다. 이 부분을 꼭 서술해주시길 바랍니다. 수고많으셨습니다. |
|
리딩, 리스닝 포인트가 두 개씩밖에 없어서 두 개만 했어요!