▶ Your Answer :
Some people believe that citizens do not
have to pay public transportations. There are obviously many opinions regarding
this topic, but it is clear that expending money for public transportation is
more beneficial. The concepts of stress and a heavy tax clearly illustrate this
theme.
First and foremost, free public
transportation make people stress out. This is mainly because, unlike receiving
fare, transportation companies have to be managed through funding sponsored by
a city. The money from a city is not sufficient enough to manage these
companies. Therefore, companies have to increase interval times between buses
in order not to circumvent loss. (what do you mean by this?)Consequently, these situations bring about inconvenience
and stress for residents in the city. Therefore, charging fee for public transformation
is good for citizens. For example, when I was young, I lived in a backwater, upstream
of a river. My city provided free buses circulating inside of the city because
the capital located in downstream give my city subsidies instead of less
developing the city. Thanks to a municipal policy, I did not have to pay for a bus.
However, since the policy was enacted, the buses have gotten pass from nine
times to two times a day. I should have gone to school at 6 am less I am late. I would
not have taken the inconvenience provided I paid bus fare.
In addition, not paying transportation for
citizens enables them to burden more tax. This is due to the fact that, compared
to spending money on subways and buses, the government must support transportation
companies. The more citizens make use of them, the more money has to be spent
on public transportations. This means that the government should bring more
money from people in the city. Consequently, city people ought to pay more tax
no matter how they exploit. For example, my city operated a program helping youngsters
get a job. The government of a city provides two hundred dollars per month only
for students. In order to manage this program, the city asked citizens for more
tax. This situation would apply to city people providing free public
transportations. They will experience that there is no profit; even they have
to take a risk that they have to pay more tax.
Taking all of these things into account, we
should agree with the idea due to the significance of inconvenience and a tax
burden. There is no doubt in my mind that providing free public transportation
for people in a city will harm their future.
transportation입니다. that어구가 많이 보이는 편입니다. 조금은 줄이고, 다른 어휘도 번갈아 쓰는거 추천드립니다. 이해할 수 없는 문장들이 많이 보입니다. 문법 오류/문장 오류들이 섞인 거 같고 주장을 설득력있게 써야하는데, 그냥 단어들을 나열해놓은 거 같다는 생각이 들었습니다. |