▶ Your Answer : In the reading passage, there is ample support for the author's claim that ashen light of venus is generated by some causes. However, in the lecture, the professor gives several reasons as a rebuttal to the author's point. First, the professor contends that it is unreliable that chemical processes evoke the ashen light. the light which is produced by chemical recombination is very weak. So, it is not easy to detect the light by using moderate equipments. This casts doubt on the reading passage's claim that recombination between carbon monoxide and oxygen generate the ashen light. Next, the professor insists that it is highly unlikely that the ashen light is sunlight reflected off clouds. He says that the ashen light rarely occur even while the venus is always exposed persistently by the Sun. This counters the reading passage's assertion that the ashen light is sunlight reflected off clouds composed of liquid sulfuric acid Finally, the professor maintains that it is not true that aurorae are the ashen light in the venus. Plasma can be drawn in planet's atmosphere by only magnetic field of planets. However, the venus doesn't have the magnetic field. Thus, aurora cannot be created in the Venus. This refutes the reading passage's arguments that the aurora which is occur when plasma from the sun hits the planet's atmosphere is the ashen light.
점수: 22 리딩에 대한 정보가 많이 부족한 통합형 에세이입니다. 통합형 에세이에서 가장 중요한 부분을 차지하는 것은 한 주제에 대하여서 서로 다른 정보를 가지고 있는 리딩과 리스닝이 어떻게 비교하고 반박을 하는 것인지를 모르겠습니다. 리딩에 대한 부분을 한 문장으로만 서술하였는데 한 문장으로 끝내는 것 보다는 리스닝을 좀 더 반박할 수 있는 부분들을 더 서술하시길 바랍니다. 수고많으셨습니다. |