▶ Your Answer : In the reading passage's there is ample support for the author's claim that GM crops benefit human greatly. However, the professor in the lecture gives several reasons as a rebuttal to the author's point. First, the professor contends that GM cannot solve the hunger problem. There is already a lot of food for all people in the world. The actual cause is unequal food distribution. If we don't resolve the food dissemination problems, GM crops can't be used for the hunger. This casts doubt on the reading passage's argument that GM crops will solve the problem of the world hunger. Next, the professor insists that GM crops do not reduce price of food but increase the price. Many agricultural companies have invested lots of money to develop GM crops. Moreover, GM crops need more water. So higher cost of seeds and water makes food prices rising. This counters the reading passage's assertion that GM crops have reduced the food price. Finally, the professor argues that GM crops have same vaccine problems. GM vaccines are fruit plants, so they also need to be cool. And additional cost by transporting and storing them can occur. This refutes the reading passage's suggestion that GM crops can create more widely used vaccines.
점수: 27 지적할 부분이 없는 통합형 에세이입니다. 통합형 에세이에서 가장 중요한 부분을 차지하는 것은 한 주제에 대하여서 서로 다른 정보를 가지고 있는 리딩과 리스닝이 어떻게 비교하고 반박을 하는 것인지를 보는 것 입니다. 지금 이 에세이 같은 경우는 리딩이나 리스닝 둘 다 구체적으로 자기가 무엇을 말하려고 하는 것인지를 잘 아는 거 같습니다. 서로의 구체적인 설명들을 통하여서 주제에 대해 서로 어떤 견해를 가지고 있는 지를 잘 파악할 수 있었습니다. 수고많으셨습니다. |