▶ Your Answer :
Given article explains a danger of
sucralose, an artificial sweetener. However, according to the lecture, those
dangers are highly exaggerated and professor explains that why those dangers
are pointless.
First of all, the professor says that the
possibility of diabetes mentioned in the article is not reasonable. She argues
that increase of insulin means nothing as there are other diets who also can
have a same result. She also points out that having a sucralose with diet soda
does not contribute to a risk of diabetes. Rather, she emphasizes that diabetes
can be caused by physical characteristic of individual.
Next, sucralose's impact on creating a
harmful substance is also not trustworthy since the experiment has been
conducted under a specific condition, not in realistic setting. Lecturer points
out that the experiment has been done in much more higher temperature than
ordinary circumstance and also with chemicals which are not often used in our
kitchen.
Finally, there are some intense allergic
reactions observed by some people, but she determines this as a result of media
which spreads the fear of this sucralose. And she also mentions that this
experience-based-data does not mean anything to scientific research, in which
there is no indications of allergic reaction founded yet.
Fair: 17~23 점수: 21 일단 이 통합형을 읽어 나갔을 때 느낀점은 어? 리딩에 대한 부분은 어디있지? 였습니다. 통합형 에세이에서 가장 중요한 부분을 차지하는 것 중에 하나는 한 주제에 대한 서로 다른 정보를 가지고 있는 리딩과 리스닝이 어떻게 비교하고 반박하냐 인데. 지금 이 에세이 같은 경우는 리딩에 대한 정보가 없습니다. 리딩에 대한 정보를 꼭 상기시키면서 서술하시길 바랍니다. 수고많으셨습니다.
|