▶ Your Answer :
In the reading passage, there is ample supports for the author's claim that there are three merits about agricultural subsidies for farmers. However, the professor in the lecture gives several reasons as a rebuttal to the author's point.
First, the professor contends that agricultural subsidies cannot result in increasing food supply increases. When farmers can produce a lot of crops food production such as corn through subsidies, they will make resource like gas by using this product. (Why is gas mentioned?) As a result, an increased amount of this crop yield does not make up for the food supply. (What does it mean?) This cast doubt on the reading passage's claim that agriculture is are highly affected by weather condition. Thus, if farmers give (Not get?) agricultural subsidies to government, they can fix the problem related to whether to use the subsidies.
Next, the professor insists that actually the price of food will be increased. (Because of what?) Farmers usually grow a certain crop such as corn through public assistance. Therefore, the amount of fruit and vegetable will be reduced, and their price will be highly increased. This counters the reading passage's claim that since subsidies can be attributed to cutting down the cost of farming, the price of food can be significantly decreased.
Finally, the professor argues that it is unlikely that subsidies support to economic health in rural areas. This is because the farmers who cultivate crops in the large land does not hire a lot of people, but rather purchase the equipment used for farming. Thus, rural communities cannot obtain experience economic merit. This refutes the reading passage's suggestion that considering that many farmers can cultivate a large amount of land thanks to subsidies, they will hire much more workers in rural areas. As a result, it can give rise to of healthy economic environment in this region. 채점기준표 | Grammar | Contents | Example | Coherence | 점수 | 2 | 2
| 2 | 2 | Score | Limited 15-18 | - 첫 번째 내용에서는 문장이 서로 연결되어 있지 않고, gas? 와 같은 새로운 단어가 언급됨에도 불구하고 설명이 충분이 되어 있지 않습니다. - 두 번째는 주장이 명확하지 않습니다. - 세 번째 이유는 왜 사람들이 직원을 더 고용하지 않고 farming equipment 를 구입하려는지에 대한 이유를 밝혀주세요. - 단/복수 의 정확한 사용이 필요합니다.
|
|