▶ Your Answer : Some people think that sudden decisions always have problems. However, in my opinion, quick decisions are sometimes needed and cause bring about right results. This is because a swift decision is required under emergency circumstances and careful choices are not right at all times.
To begin with, speedy decisions are needed when emergency situations such as outbreak of a car accident or a big fire patients occur. The reason is that a delayed decision treat might cause bad outcomes or even worsen the situation. For example, there was a poll conducted by the Medical Center of Korea with hospital workers as respondents. The purpose of the survey was to understand about the consensus view about what is the most important factor (Of what?) when working in hospital. The majority of respondents responded that prompt choices are the most significant factor since life or death are decided in short time when crisis happens. This survey proves that quick decisions are needed.
On top of that, a contemplate decision often does not cause better outcomes. This means that sometimes meditate prudent decisions give rise to the same results as hasty choices do. For instance, when I was in college, I took a sociology class and I had to do a group project with my classmates. We gathered in order to choose a topic. After discussion for 5 hours, we selected set a subject, the phenomenon of immigrants as a topic, which was already mentioned at first. From this experience, I felt that faster resolution a careful decision always makes a better result. To sum up, sudden decisions are important under a certain situation and a meditate choice does not get a good outcome at any time. In this regard, I do not agree that quick decisions are never right ones.
| 채점기준표 | Grammar | Contents | Example | Coherence | 점수 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | Score | Fair 16-19 | - 빠른 결정에 동의한다는 점에서 응급상황과 병원에 긴급한 상황들을 예로 든점이 상당히 강력하였습니다. - 첫 번째 주장과는 달리 두 번째 주장은 다소 약한 편이며, 근거가 충분하지 않습니다. |
|