▶ Your Answer :
Some people think that the government should cut the budget which associated with military or schools because public libraries are still important for citizens who want to study or read books. However, in my opinion, consensus people will be able to be benefited by reducing public libraries. The reasons are that public libraries are quite expensible to sustain comparing to others and there are a lot of another options to fulfill its object. government should diminsh the money on public library for the following two subsequent reasons.
To begin with, the benefits of public libraries do not exceed their costs. This is because a A (설명을 할 때에는 this is because~같은 표현은 적절치 않습니다) lot of money is required to build and maintain public libraries, but only a small amount of people actually use them on a regular basis but not many people visit public library. Thus cutting spending on public libraries would save a large amount of money but would not have a great impact on a large number of people. For example, a research was conducted by Gallup Research Center. The research proved that only 30 percent of ROK citizens regularly visit a public library. In contrast, according to ROK department of Education, more than 90 percent of Korean children attend a school. Therefore, the goverment should not cut the education budget.
On top of that, public library users have many suitable alternatives that they can use if funding is reduced. It means that people still can access easily to a book even though public libraries are closed. to read a book as other places also support books to people For instance, I recently wanted to borrow a book to read during winter break, but the public library in my hometown was closed for a national holiday. Instead, I went to a local bookstore who which (who는 사람 명사에만 사용 됩니다) offered a wild range of used books, and I was able to find a book what I wanted to read. This demonstrates that there are good alternatives to libraries when people want to get some reading materials. On the other hand, the services that the military provides cannot be replaced by other government organizations or private companies. So, funding for the Military should not be reduced.
To sum up, cutting a budget for public libraries is appropriate solution to the government because benefits that public libraries can provide are not overwhelm its cost and it has lots of plausible options have more cost and other solutions are accessible. In this regard, I firmly believe that the government should spend less money on public libraries
점수: 23 일단 지금 이 에세이를 보면서 느끼셨겠지만. 내용 부분에 있어서 구체적인 부분이 많이 부족합니다. 지금 이 에세이는 왜 정부가 공용 도서관의 사용을 줄여야 하는 지에 대한 설명을 하였는데. 정작 각 단락은 이러한 설명 부분에 있어서는 많은 부족함을 보여주고 잇는 거 같습니다. 따라서 지금 이 에세이가 필요한 것은 구체적으로 자신의 주장을 더 풀어나가시길 바랍니다. 수고많으셨습니다. |