▶ Your Answer : The lecture insists discusses that it is possible that European people traveled across the Atlantic Ocean and contacted with Native Americans because a European silver coin dating to the eleventh century was discovered at a Native American archaeological site. This contradicts the reading passage's claim that some archaeologists believe that the coin is not a genuine piece of historical evidence but a historical fake.
First, the lecturer she says that Native American was able to travel around the area in where the coin was found. This casts doubt on the reading passage's claim that the Native American site where the coin was found is located so far from other sites documenting a Norse presence in North America. lecture 주장을 뒷받침하는 근거도 같이 요약해주세요.
Second, she the speaker describes that it was possible that the silver coins had been returned to Europe after using in at the North America. This refutes the reading passage's claim that no other coins have been discovered at the area. 두 내용이 어떻게 대립되는지가 좀 더 잘 드러나도록 정리해주세요. '다른 동전은 발견되지 않았다'와 '은화가 사용되고 돌려보내졌을 수 있다'가 어떤 맥락에서 사용된 주장인지가 드러나야 합니다.
Finally, she points out that the North America might have wanted want to get the coin because they loved beautiful things. Although they did was not use the coin as a money, it was possible enough possible to have the coin for them. This counters the reading passage's claim that the Norse who traveled to North America would have supposed that the coin would not be useful to them.
Comment : 각 본론에서 정리된 주장은 두 지문의 입장을 정리하기 위한 내용이 되어야 합니다. 현재 본론에서 정리된 내용은 어떤 맥락에서 사용된 것인지가 불분명하기 때문에 '반박'으로 이해하기 어려운 부분들이 있습니다. 실제 지문을 다시 확인해보시고 main topic에 대한 reading/lecture의 입장이 각각 어떻게 다르고, lecture가 어떻게 반박하는지를 더 보완해서 정리해보시면 좋을 것 같아요. 수고 많으셨습니다~!
Integrated Writing Rubrics Score 3/5 A response at this level contains some important information from the lecture and conveys some relevant connection to the reading, but it is marked by one or more of the following : - Although the overall response is definitely oriented to the task, it conveys only vague, global, unclear, or somewhat imprecise connection of the points made in the lecture to points made in the reading. - The response may omit one major key point made in the lecture. - Some key points made in the lecture or the reading, or connections between the two, may be incomplete, inaccurate, or imprecise. - Errors of usage and/or grammar may be more frequent or may result in noticeably vague expressions or obscured meanings in conveying ideas and connections. |