▶ Your Answer :
It is controversial which part of public spending should be reduced for government to overcome a budget deficit. method for the government to use when they try to reduce their spending. In this regard, I can say that reducing a budget on art is the best way among 3 examples. I think that park gives us a perfect place to take a rest in this complicated society and public transit can reduce contamination. Those are why I think the government should not reduce budget on park and public transit but should reduce a budget on art.
To begin with, park can give us a place to rest and to feel nature. To be specific, people in modern society doesn't have enough time to hike and feel fresh air. and If there's a park near our hometown, we can breath can provide us with fresh air, see beautiful green scenery, and place to take a walk around that place. Moreover, parks can reduce carbon dioxide in the surrounding atmosphere, which it expels the harmful materials causing air that causes green house effect. However, art gallery cannot. For example, me and my friends sometimes go to a park to take a walk and feel fresh air. Also, we can talk each other, appreciate beautiful scenery, and take pictures. However, we cannot talk in art exhibit, take pictures, and lay on the grounds. Thus, I can say that the government should keep investment on park rather than art.
Moreover, public transit is the best way for employees to go to work. (Not confined to workers, also students, older people can use the public transportation) To be specific, as public transit is much cheaper than buying or leasing a car, many employees usually take buses or subway to save money. Also, public transit is helpful to moderate the global warming as the number of car on the road that is the main cause of global warming. This can be decreased by taking buses or subway. But art is just a luxury and doesn't have any useful benefit to people except appreciation to few people who interest in it. For example, everyday in the morning and evening, there are so many commuters in a bus. If the government stops supporting public transportation to support art galleries, they cannot go to work or should buy their own cars. It has negative effects on commuters and for not only employees' budget but also environment. Therefore, I think that the government shouldn't decrease a budget on public transportation. To sum up, I strongly believe that the government must not reduce spending on public transit and park for the following reasons: parks give us places to rest and public transportation is essential for people who are living in modern society.
| 채점기준표 | Grammar | Contents | Example | Coherence | 점수 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 3 | Score | Fair 19-22 | - global warming이 자동차에 의하여 생긴다기 보다는 자동차가 뿜어내는 harmful chemical, carbon dioxide, gas 등이 대기중의 공기를 오염시켜 도시의 기온을 높이고, 이 때문에 온난화가 가중화 된다는 점을 풀어서 설명해주시는 것이 좋습니다.
|
|
|