Although there is no
complete consensus that has been reached on this topic, yet I would like to
take a stance and make my disagreement with the given thesis that in twenty years
there will be fewer cars in use than there are today. In order to substantiate
my central focal points, I will provide specific reasons and explore the given
topic in great detail in this essay.
To begin with, I firmly believe that use of cars will not be decreased in
twenty years. Since cars are one of the major
transportations that have been provided in public, it seems that people will
use cars in their lives even more than twenty years later. Opponents of
my perspective claim that there will be more developed technology and vehicles
which adopt the new technology and might
replace the majority of transportation that people use. Proponents of this view
several points as the rationales for their argument and their argument might
have some validity. But after closer look, there exists an abundance of
examples that calling call into question
what they claim. Among such examples, an instance that I am going to describe
here can elucidate their incorrect viewpoint. As far as I am concerned, such form as the
overall forms of cars will be maintained. This is because people have
developed cars, not really changing their form but keeping the form and
reconstructing designs and components of it. Accordingly, the form will not be
changed in twenty years, but its techniques and forms will be prominently
developed to the various forms types.
Such forms as electric cars and many other
developed forms will be used for people. On the other hands, the form of
cars will not be changed, but it will be just developed. This validates my
earlier contention that use of cars will not be decreased in twenty years. (forms라는 단어를 너무 많이 쓰셨습니다. 또한 한
번만 써도 되는 같은 말을 반복적으로 적은 느낌이 있어요. ‘Form of cars가 구체적으로 뭘
의미하는 지 설명해 주세요.)
The account of mine that I illustrated above is not the only evidence to
support my view. A recent survey conducted by one of the leading educational
consulting firms in Korea endorsed my opinion when the survey respondents were
asked whether they sided with the argument that there will be fewer cars in use
in twenty years or not. A leading educational expert claims claimed that there will be no transportation that will
be able to replace the use of cars in twenty
years from now. The expert also asserts asserted
that twenty years are too short to develop one technology and put it into
practice. Generally, it takes many times a long
period of time for a technology to settle. to settle a
technology. For example, people have put their efforts to develop technology
that a car can drive by itself without human an
automatic driving technology. As far as I know, this technology has been
developed for at least for more than 20 years; however, it is not really generalized used by the public yet. Accordingly, it is seemed to
be impossible that there will be fewer cars in use in twenty years from now.
In conclusion, in spite of the fact that there may be some opinions that use of
cars will be decreased in the future, taking into account of all the factors
that I described above, we may reach to the conclusion that in twenty
years there will not be fewer cars in use.
Writing 0-30 Score Scale |
Fair (17-23) |
Score |
22 |
Overall Comment: |
문법 오류가 많습니다. 템플릿 이용은 좋았지만, 주장하실 때 같은 말을 매우 반복적으로 쓰시는 경향이 있어서 아쉬웠어요. 문법 오류들은 위 지적사항들을 확인하세요. |
|