The lecture and the written passage are about the domestication of dogs,
in three perspectives. The written passage has different aspect from the
lecture relating to the three perspectives. (주제를 먼저 적어주시고, author이 3가지 주장을 하고 있다, 라고 적으신 다음에 lecturer이 이 주장들을 counter하고 있다, 라는 식으로 써주세요. 예를 들면, Both the reading and the lecture
discuss the domestication of dogs. The author raises three points to argue his
viewpoints; while the lecturer disagrees with him by raising three
counter-arguments. 식으로 써주세요.)
Firstly, they have different opinions about how dogs were domesticated. The written
passage asserts that dogs evolved from wolves. The
author argues that they were trained to help hunting people hunt and eventually learned loyalty and
friendliness toward humans. However, the lecturer disagrees with it, because hunters usually used
traps, waiting to hunt, which is a different
hunting style from the methods of wolves which
were active and aggressive.
Secondly, they have different opinions
about when dogs were domesticated. The written passage asserts that dogs were
domesticated 16,000 years ago, according to DNA information. However, the
lecture shows us that there is an evidence proving that the first domestication
took place about 26,000 years ago. He says that researchers
have found the footprints of a dog and a child dog
and a child’s foot prints in a French cave.
Thirdly, they have
different opinions about where dogs were
domesticated. The written passage shows that that dogs were first domesticated
in China, since China had highest genetic diversity of dogs. However, the
lecturer asserts that domestication of dogs happened in multiple places,
according to fossils spread all around the world.