▶ Your Answer :
In the reading
passage, there is ample support for the author’s claim that the crest of
Lambeosaurus plays a role in a distinctive physical feature. However, the
professor in the lecture gives several reasons as a rebuttal to the author’s
point.
First of all,
the lecturer points out that attracting mates using the crests is doubtful using crests to attract opposite sex is doubtful. The
lecturer mentions that reptiles do not use it for mating to mate because they rely on
behavior instead of appearance. For instance, some type of reptiles lift their
head or make noise while communicating. This casts doubt on the reading
passage’s claim that a bunch of fossils show the crests might be used to
mating that crests could have been used to attract female.
In addition,
according to the lecture, fossils show that the crests were backward instead of
forward. This means they did not utilize it for combat to combat (전치사를 잘못 활용햇습니다). This is because it is
impossible to fight using crests are backward It is impossible to fight using crests when they are backward. Furthermore, the speaker
explains that the crests would be fragile to defense or attack due to hollow
inside. This refutes the reading passage’s arguments that the crests helped
themselves as weapon during the combat.
The final point made
by the lecture is that the crests did not supply air while the dinosaurs ate
under the water. Also, the lecturer mentions that the crests could not contain
large amount of air because they were so small. However, the Lambeosaurus was
massive and it needed a huge amount of air. This counters the reading passage’s
assertion that Lambeosaurus spent a lot of time on underwater to eat aquatic
plants.
점수: 23 일단 문법적인 오류들이 있으니 제가 지적한 부분을 보시면서 숙지하시길 바랍니다. 지금 이 에세이에서 필요한 것은 리딩에 대한 구체적인 설명입니다. 지금 이 에세이는 리스닝에 대한 부분은 아주 구체적으로 예시 까지 포함해서 잘 설명하였습니다. 하지만 리딩에 대한 부분을 한 문장으로만 서술하였는데 한 문장으로 끝내는 것 보다는 리스닝을 좀 더 반박할 수 있는 부분들을 더 서술하시길 바랍니다. 수고많으셧습니다. |