■ Direction You have 20 minutes to plan and write your response. Your response will be judged on the basis of The quality of writing and on how well your response presents the points in the lecture and the relationship to the reading passage. Typically, an effective response will be 150 to 225 words. ■ Question Summarize the points made in the lecture you just heard, explaining how they cast doubt on the points made in the reading
|
|
|
▶ Topic : 통합형은 문법/흐름 위주로 봐주시면 감사하겠습니당. |
|
|
▶ Your Answer :
In the reading passage, there is ample support for the author's claim that the government's subsides are beneficial. However, the professor in the lecture gives several reasons as a rebuttal to the author's point. First, the professor contends that the subsides do not result in the increase of food productions. In the US, subsides are usually given for corns, which are used to make ethanol. So, production of staples cannot be affected by subsides for those are used for such a biofuel. This casts doubt on the reading passage's claim that it stabilizes food supply because farmers can grow additional crops for the subsides. (reading 얘기 더 해주세요)
Next, the professor insists that it cannot help food price get lower. Sometimes it even helps increase for in price of some crops. Subsides are concentrated on only some crops, such as corn and rice. For this reason, farmers would put almost their whole efforts in these crops, and not for others. The cost of other crops would be increased because of the limited amount of them. This counters the reading passage's assertion that it can lower the price of food in that the possible offset caused by subsides will make profits for farmers even though the crops cost low.
Finally, the professor argues that it does not help economic growth in rural areas. In this industrialized society, most farms have been mechanized. They would not hire employees anymore, even though there are subsides. They would prefer to use that money on purchasing more machineries. It would help just for the owners' benefits, not for prosperity of communities as a whole. This refutes the reading passage's suggestion that it will make rural areas more healthier and less poverty.
|
|
1. 각 문단 시작 전에 tab 버튼 눌러서 들여쓰기 해주세요.
2. 한 문단은 3문장 이상으로 칩니다. introduction 분량을 늘려주세요.
3. 전체적인 흐름은 좋으나 디테일이 많이 부족합니다.
리딩에 대한 문장은 각 문단 당 한 문장 밖에 안 나옵니다.
양 사이드당 3문장 이상, (최소 세 문장) 나올 수 있게 해주세요.
리딩과 리스닝에서 evidence를 덜 잡으신 것 같습니다.
리딩은 어차피 시험 때 옆에 보이고 글 쓰는 내내 확인할 수 있으니 paraphrase를 영리하게 하시면 좋을 것 같습니다.
또한 에비던스를 잘 못잡았더라도 하나의 evidence에서 elaborate하시면서 분량을 늘려주시면 더 좋을 것 같습니다.
수고하셨습니다. *^^*