▶ Your Answer :
The reading and the lecturer both talked
about disadvantages of single-stream recycling. The reading suggested three
disadvantages of single-stream recycling. Although the lecturer agreed with
some disadvantages, she said single-stream recycling is more efficient than
traditional recycling.
First of all, the reading said
single-stream recycling is so dangerous because employees at the plant are
exposed to much risk. However, the lecturer said these danger can be prevented
by safety training and safety equipment such as thick gloves.
Secondly, the reading told that
single-stream recycling is not efficient because it wastes valuable resource.
In the contrary, the lecturer stated single-stream recycling center can get
more resource than traditional recycling center because people can be throw all
kinds of garbage at once.
Finally, the reading argued single-stream
recycling is too expensive to be switched from traditional recycling. Although
the lecturer agreed with that opinion, she said that expensive costs is spent
on only instituting a plant and in other aspect, maintenance costs of single-stream
recycling is cheaper than traditional recycling. She said traditional recycling
needs many trucks for each kind of resource but single-stream recycling needs
only one truck.
점수: 24 일단 통합형 에세이에서는 결론이 필요하지 않습니다. 이미 인트로에서 두 개를 반박하고 있다 라고 시작을 하기 때문에 결론이 따로 필요없습니다. 지금 이 에세이 같은 경우는 마지막 이유 재외하고는 리딩이나 리스닝 둘 다 설명이 많이 부족한 거 같습니다. 각 의견을 한 문장으로만 서술하였는데 한 문장으로는 무슨 말을 하려고 하는 지에 대해서는 너무 부족한 거 같습니다. 따라서 리딩과 리스닝의 설명을 더 하시길 바랍니다. 수고많으셧습니다.
For these reasons, the lecturer said
single-stream recycling is better than traditional recycling.
|