▶ Your Answer :
The
reading passage contends that the roles of Lambeosaurus’ crest can be fully
explained by three theories. However, the lecturer brings up several points
that contradict this argument.
First
of all, the speaker argues that attraction using a crest is unreliable. This is
because reptile attracts mates by behaviors and sounds, not by appearance. For
example, crocodiles sound the make low growling noises when they lure mates. Lambeosaurus
might use the a similar way. This casts doubt on the reading passage’s claim that
Lambeosaurus used the crest when they are willing to attract mates.
Second,
according to the lecturer, it is unlikely that Lambeosaurus combated by the
crest. This is supported by the fact that the crest was shaped as backward. If Lambeosaurus
used the crest when they fight, the crest might be a forward shape. Also, the
crest was not an adequate weapon since the crests were hollow, and then they
were fragile. This refutes the reading passage’s assertion that the crests were
used for combat.
The
final point made by the lecturer was that the crests do not prove the supplement
of air. The reason is that Lambeosaurus was a massive dinosaur, so they needed
a lot of air to breath. The crests could not have been enough to store the huge amount of
the air. Lambeosaurus might use up the stored air in the crests in just a few
seconds. This counters the reading passage’s argument that Lambeosaurus could
be breath in the water thanks to the crests.
예상 점수: 21-24 총평: 글의 문단을 잘 정리해주셨고 그 내용도 적합하게 강의와 에세이를 잘 대조해서 적어주신 것 같습니다. 전체적으로 내용 보다는 문법상 오류가 많이 존재하는데 우선 the와 a를 사용하실 때 the는 특정한 것을 지칭할 때 쓰시는 것이고 a는 많은 것중 하나일 때를 지칭할 때 쓰는 것입니다. 꼭 구별해서 사용해 주세요. 또한 불필요한 접속사나 관사는 사용하지 말아주세요. 글을 오히려 이해하기 어렵게 만듭니다. 수고 많으셨습니다. |