▶ Your Answer :
In the reading, using tamarisk beetle as a natural way to eradicate the tamarisk tree has opposition. On the other hand, the lecturer asserts that the reading’s claim is not persuasive.
First, the writer argues that it is hard to control the spread of this beetle. Since this invasive species migrate to nearby areas, it will cause severe ecological threat. The speaker rebuffs this explanation arguing that this is not true. As the tamarisk tree is the only food source to tamarisk beetle, it is impossible for it to grow without the tree. Also, there are a lot of natural predators, which gives rise to controlling the population constantly.
Second, the reading contends that it takes a long time to kill a tree and during the period, the tree will make use of a sufficient amount of water. The lecturer challenges this by arguing that these insects result in an immediate influence on the water use of this tree. Due to the photosynthesis which requires a lot of water, the tamarisk trees will be significantly affected by the insects.
Finally, the writer claims that these insects can cause a higher risk of wildfires. This is due to the fact that having a large amount of debris from dead woods easily gives rise to the increasing possibility of wildfires occurrence. The speaker rebuffs this by saying that this problem is not severe. The government has a lot of experiences so it is easy to prevent wildfires. Extinguishing and littering the debris before it spread out can lower the level of a fire hazard.
점수: 27 지적할 부분이 없는 통합형 에세이입니다. 통합형 에세이에서 가장 중요한 부분을 차지하는 것은 한 주제에 대하여서 서로 다른 정보를 가지고 있는 리디오가 리스닝이 어떻게 비교하고 반박을 하는 것인지를 보는 것 입니다. 지금 이 에세이 같은 경우에 있어서는 리딩이나 리스닝 둘 다 서로 구체적으로 자신의 주장을 잘 전달하고 있는 거 같습니다. 각 단락의 구체적 설명을 통하여서 서로 의 견해가 무엇인지 잘 파악할 수 있었습니다. 수고많으셧습니다. |