▶ Your Answer : According to the reading passage, it suggest that there are several hypothesis with a lot of potentials, which cause the events known as TLP. On the other hand, the lecturer casts doubt the reading passage's claim as so.
First and foremost, it is little more than a coincidence of the release of gases with hues. In addition, the observation that has been proved seem not to be plausible. To be specific, the frequency of gases emitted seems to be too occasional to conclude this hypothesis. This counters the reading passage's claim that clouds beneath the surface are the main culprit of this phenomena.
On top of that, the lecturer mentions that there are too little evidence that would solidify the suggestion. That is to say, the amount of dusts were too little, not like dust storms, which were out of capacity of human-beings could observe. This calls into question the reading passage's assertion that illuminated clouds are rendering the glows.
Last, there are insufficient data to prove the flares occur the phenomena. As scientists have observed the frequency of the flares , it has been concluded that most of the results did not match to the occurrence of the illumination of the Sun. This strongly refutes the reading passage's argument that solar radiations, made by solar flares in the Sun, create the phenomena of TLPs. |