▶ Your Answer :
/흐름이 맞는지+예상점수+고득점을위한방향/도 언급해주시면 감사하겠습니다.
The
reading passage and the lecture both deal with the red rain of Indian state of
Kerala. The reading passage provides three pieces of rational explanations to
show the or igin of the red rain, whereas the lecture argues against it by
providing three compelling rebuttals.
Firstly, the article points out that the red
rain contained the blood of bats. To explain, the migrating bats was destroyed
in a thunderstorm. So their DNA can be detected in an analaysis analysis
of rain sample. However, the lecturer challenges that point by
stating that it is far-fetched. (스크립트 보고 보완) According to the expert, to
prove that the red rain was caused by the bats blood, more than five
million bats have to be sacrificed at the same time. Also, that much amount
of bat’s remains has not found in near place.
(amount 단수)
Secondly, the author argues that the rain is
resultation from a volcanic eruption in the
Philippines. When eruption occurs, the massive acidic dusts mixed with clouds.
These mixtures of low pH lead to the red rain. On the other hand, the
professor makes an opposing point to this argument. The professor's point is
that it is not true. This is because, (스크립트 보고 보완) although this eruption was observed in
the Philippines, the red rain was observed only in the Kerela, not in the
Philippin. Also, other countries such as the Vietnam and the Malaysia which
are in between the two countries did not experience the red rain.
Finally, the wirter writer
goes on to explain that chemical pollutions from near factories
considered to the red rain. lots of pollutants emitted from the industrial
institutes move directly into the clouds and then combine with moisture. In
result, they became the red rain. On the contrary, the speaker refutes the
writer's claim by stating that, in local place of Kerala, there are only few
factories. (스크립트 보고 보완)The mention of reading passage cannot be proved because a place
with lots of factories should have observed the red rain.
|