▶ Your Answer :
The lecturer questions the explanations about the function of antlers in the reading by presenting a few refuting aspects. According to the lecture, no considerable evidences would prove that antlers have certain known functions, unlike what the reading argues. The lecturer maintains that antlers are not for use in attracting mates. In fact, deer are using vocalization or body posture to attract females rather than using antlers. Not only that, female deer prefers smaller antlers. However, the reading describes that deer are using their antlers to lure female deer in that female deer prefer large antlers. Another problem that the lecturer talks about is that deer would not mark their territory using their antlers. Actually, deer do not mark their territory, making a visual sign to trees. Deer uses scent to recognize other male deer since the scent can be easily detected. Not only that, the reason why deer rub against trees is to remove their other skin, not marking their territory. This counters the argument in the reading that they are peeling off the trees to show their territory, making a warning to other males. Lastly, the lecturer presents that antler is not a use for defending themselves. Based on the reading, since deer are in continuous danger from predators, they use their antlers to protect themselves especially in winter, such as from wolves. On the contrary, the lecturer contends that male deer would not use their antlers since they shed in the winter. Moreover, the deer that protects their offspring is female, not male deer. In conclusion, the three arguments given in the reading could not be proven since antlers do not have certain functions as what the reading presents. |