▶ Your Answer : Both the reading passage and the lecturer from the listening focus on the health impact resulting from the use of sucralose as an artificial sweetner. While the author from the article argues that the use of the substance possesses a high possibility of it being detrimental to the body, the professor from the lecture objects to this view. To begin with, the lecturer states that sucralose is not the direct cause for the development of diabetes. On the reading passage, the author asserts that sucralose is likely to bring about the increase in insulin, leading to diabetes by letting the cells be resistant to insulin. The (무슨 스터디인가요? 지금 이 paragraph의 경우엔 reading과 listening이 번갈아서 나오는데 study conducted from이런 식으로 꼭 적어줘야 구분이 갑니다) study indicating that people who consume sucralose on a daily basis are more likely to develop diabetes, is proposed. On the other hand, the professor from the lecture goes against the notion that it is the cause of diabetes. She explains that while it is true that the consumption of sucralose increases the release of insulin, it does not mean that it leads to diabetes as in the case of Risin of potatoes that shows the similar effect. Moreover, the lecturer claims it is the personal obesity that is the physical cause to the occurrence of diabetes. On top of that, the lecturer suggests that sucralose is unlikely to produce harmful materials. According to the article, researchers have found that exposure to high temperature makes sucralose produce substances like chloropropanol, which can be a cause for cancer. However, the lecturer alleges that sucralose do not produce any harmful substances. The lecturer doubts the result of the conducted research; She 특히 화자가 번갈아서 나오는 상황에서 갑자기 she라고 적으면 못 알아 듣습니다. she라고 쓰려면 앞에서부터 힌트를 줘야 합니다. points out that the research did not use real life ingredients, thus making the outcome untrustworthy. Furthermore, some of the researchers admitted that they heated sucralose even higher than normal to achieve the desired results. Finally, the professor from the lecture is doubtful about the argument that sucralose deteriorates allergic reaction. As suggested in the reading passage, a number of incidents where people experienced intense allergic reactions after consuming sucralose have been reported. On the contrary, the professor from the listening insists that this claim is unlikely to be true. According to her explanation, the anecdotal data of the incidents is unreliable. On the study testing whether sucralose is safe to people with allergies, the outcome showed that none of the people actually went through allergic reaction after eating sucralose.
lecturer from listening, reading 반드시 적어서 화자 clear하게 전해줘야 합니다. 전체적인 detail은 좋은 편입니다. 주장 설명 잘 된 것 같아 읽기 괜찮았습니다. introduction을 쓸거면 conclusion도 꼭 써줘야 합니다. (아니면 아예 둘 다 적지 않는 방법도 있습니다) |