▶ Your Answer :
Both the reading passage and the lecturer from the listening focus on the methods developed to make use of coal as an environmentally friendly energy source. While the reading passage suggests three ways that could make coal less detrimental to the environment, the professor from the lecture argues that all of these methods possess severe drawbacks. First of all, the lecturer opposes to the plausibility of conversion of coal into gas. According to the reading passage, coal could be transformed to a type of gas called syngas. Syngas is highly practical in the way that it emits no pollutant while burning thanks to its purity in the structure. However, the professor is doubtful if converting coal is a feasible solution. He insists that the process of heating during the converting uses fossil fuel, thus leading to another damage to the ecosystem. In addition to that, the lecturer claims that huge amount of water gets polluted as a result of removing impurities from the original coal. On top of that, the professor from the listening goes against the method of using static electricity. In the article, the author asserts that a charge can pull substances of dust from the pollutants of the smoke and trap them in a collection plate. On the contrary, the lecturer proposes that this practice is rather noneffective. This is due to the fact that the charged plate can only gather certain ashes other than green house gases. While it is true that this could help lessen the pollution,(lessen the pollution level/아니면 아예 다른 어휘 쓰기. 이렇게 지금 애매하게 문장과 안 맞는 부분들이 조금씩 보입니다. major gas pollutants like carbon dioxide are left to be released to the atmosphere. These gases possess much more damaging effect to the air of the Earth. Finally, the lecturer states the use of fabric filters are unrealistic. It is argued in the 만약에 앞에 reading lecturer라는 걸 쓰기 싫으면 여기서라도 reading article이라고 설명을 해줘야 누가 얘기하고 있는지 알 수 있습니다. 아무리 잘 써도 화자가 누군지 헷갈리기 시작하면 의미가 없습니다. article that certain woven fabric bags could be used to collect liquid and solid wastes. These bags are placed on the vents of power stations, removing almost all harmful materials. On the other hand, the professor objects to this method of fabric filtering as it can't be a long-term solution. The fabric bags usually last for only a short period of time. Moreover, this practice needs large fans to direct the particles to the filter, making the efficiency of the energy drop drastically. In conclusion, the professor from the lecture counters all three methods proposed in the reading passage as a way of using coal without harming the environment.
제 개인적인 생각으로는 통합형에서는 introduction/conclusion은 크게 중요하지 않다고 생각합니다. 이 부분 대신에 main paragraph에 더 집중해서 적으면 좋을 것 같아요. 전체적으로 문장력이 조금은 아쉬운 편입니다. 어휘 뜻은 다 같아보여도 활용형식은 다른 부분이 있습니다. 주의해서 적으세요 |