▶ Your Answer : The reading and the lecture are both talking about
whether communal online encyclopedias are better than traditional encyclopedias
or not. The author of the reading feels that there are three possible
explanations for the possibility of error and hacking, selection of worth
information. (Unclear) The lecturer challenges the statements made by the author. She is
of the opinion that none of these theories is correct.
To begin with, the author argues that
communal online encyclopedias are able to contain incorrect information because a communal environment of these encyclopedias is written by uncertified author. The
article mentions that traditional encyclopedias are more believable because it
is written by trained experts such as professors and specialists. This specific
argument is challenged by the lecturer. She says that traditional encyclopedias
also make mistakes and it is hard to find and fix because it is printed out. On
the other hand, communal online encyclopedia is easy to find the mistake and it
will be corrected by many editors in online.
Secondly, the writer contends that the
communal environment of online encyclopedias is vulnerable from hacking or
editors who has bad will to give incorrect information. The article notes hacking
cannot be happened to traditional encyclopedias. The lecturer, however, rebuts
this by asserting that there are special editors who look at those things. (Who are they?) She elaborates
on this by mentioning that the special editors and people edit the information
will cover it.
Finally, it is stated in the article that
communal encyclopedias are too great and depth to find right information for people. (Unclear meaning) The lecturer, on the other hand, posits that selection of worth information is
not positive tendency of encyclopedias. (Clarify the sentence) She puts forth the idea that communal
online encyclopedia can reflect the diversity of information what that people have has.
채점기준표 | Grammar | Contents | Example | Coherence | 점수 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3 | Score | Fair 18-23 |
- 리딩의 내용이 리스닝에 비해 많이 포함되어 비율을 리스닝 쪽에 맞춰주는 것이 더 좋겠습니다.
- what은 선행사로 주체적으로 쓰이기 때문에 information 을 꾸며주는 문법으로 함께 쓰일 수 없습니다. - 두 번째 내용에서의 hacking과 editors에 대한 설명이 다소 부족해 보입니다. - 세 번째 주장을 명확히 표현하여 주세요. |
|