Traditionally, theorists typically proposed some sort of sudden and violent catastrophic event, such as a collision of the Sun with another stellar body or comet, as the mechanism responsible for planetary formation. The current prevailing theory regarding planetary creation, however, is centered on the concept of accretion, the gradual process by which bits of matter collide and adhere to one another to form larger particles.
Q) What can be inferred from paragraph 1 about the current prevailing theory regarding planetary creation?
A) It ignores the role of comets in planetary formation. (X)
이게 답이 아닌데, traditional theory에서 comet이 행성형성에 사용되었고, currently는 comet대신 bit of matter들이 뭉쳐져서 사용되었으니 current는 comet의 역할을 무시하고 보기는 답이 되어야 하는것 아닌가요?
어렵네요ㅠㅠ