▶ Your Answer :
In the given a set of materials, the reading and the lecture both deal with GM crops. The lecturer challenges the reading passage’s argument that GM crops are beneficial to people. First of all, the author contends that GM crops play a vital role in solving the problem of world hunger. In contrast, the lecturer refutes the statement by saying that hunger problem occurred because of unequal distribution of food. In other wards, even though crops yields more increase, poor people would not have access to them easily. Thus, the lecturer insists that the claim made in the reading is false. Second, the writer argues that GM crops have an impact on reducing the food prices. The speaker, however, rebuts the argument by asserting that it is unlikely that GM crops reduce the price of food. This is because most important goal of many companies is making profit, thus they will charge more money to customers. In addition, since GM crops require higher costs of seeds and greater amount of waters, the cost of growing of GM crops is expensive. So, the speaker maintains that the notion made in the reading is erroneous. Finally, the article claims that GM crops can make vaccines more widely available. On the other hand, the professor counters the contention by stating that GM vaccines have the same problem as conventional ones. This is supported by the fact that it is difficult for edible vaccines to store and ship. The reason is that vaccines produced by banana and tomato are spoil in warm weather easily. Therefore, the professor argues the idea made in the reading does not make sense. |