▶ Your Answer :
In the lecture, the
lecturer claims that the reading's assertion is groundless. This casts doubt on
the reading's claim that congestion pricing has several advantages. First, the lecturer
asserts that congestion pricing doesn't make driving safer. In fact, it
increases the number of accidents. This is because congestion pricing makes
less cars on the roads, so naturally the speed of cars should be
faster. Would fasten.
It is clear that
the faster the speed of cars is, the more the accidents are. This contrasts the
reading's argument that driving can be made much
safer by congestion pricing. Second, the lecturer
maintains that congestion pricing doesn't make public transportation more
convenient. This is because if the number of cars on the roads decreases, there
should be more people who use public transportation. If more people try to
catch buses, they will be less likely to
do that. <- 무슨 말인가요? Clarify 해주세요. ‘that’ 이 무엇인지 풀어주세요. This refutes that reading's
insistence that a city's public transportation network can be more convenient
due to the system. Lastly, the lecturer
argues that congestion pricing has a negative impact on businesses
within a city positively. According to a recent survey about a
relation between congestion pricing and businesses, the system causes
lagging sales. <= Why?
This rebuffs the
reading's point that the system affects businesses within a city positively. Writing 0-30 Score
Scale Fair (17-23)
Overall Comment : body 2 에서 대략적으로 무슨 이야기 하려는지 알겠는데 전달이 잘 안되요. Clear 하게 글을 써주세요. Body 3 에서는 왜 경제에 안좋은 영향을 미치는지 그 이유/과정
설명 하는 문장 하나 써주셔야 됩니다! |