| |
| |
Both the reading and the lecture deal with special payments to farmers. In the lecture, the speaker asserts that the claim suggested in the reading passage is groundless. This casts doubt on the reading’s claim that US government should continue to provide special payments to farmers.
To
begin with, the lecturer maintains that it is refutable that economic
assistance for farmers
Secondly, according to the speaker, the price of nutritious food will increase. This is because farmers tend to focus on profitable crops and only cultivate them for their profits. This may cause the lower productivity of vegetables and the price of them will be augmented on groceries. This rebuffs the reading’s insistence that the special payments to farmers give rise to a decrease in the price of food.
Lastly, the lecturer contends that subsidies do not have positive effects on rural communities. Farmers do not require a lot of workers since agriculture becomes highly mechanized. Agricultural subsidies would be used to purchase more equipment. This indicates that subsidies would induce just owners’ benefits instead of the economic growth in rural communities. This is contradictory to the reading’s point that subsidies encourage rural areas to grow economically.
Grade : Good (24-30)
Overall Comment : 스펠링 실수에 유의하신다면 충분히 좋은 점수를 기대할 수 있습니다.
| |
|