▶ Your Answer :In the set of materials, both the reading
passage and the lecturer deal with the controversial issues about the roles of
Lambeosaurus’ crests. Regarding this
topic, the lecture argues that it the fact is different from what we know about
crests of Lambeosaurus. This contradicts the writer’s assertion that Lambeosaurus’ crests had the roles of unique physical
trait7n.
First of all, according to the lecturer, it
is completely doubtful that crests were used to obtain mates. Reptiles which are similar with dinosaurs
are likely to attract another gender by behavior and sound, not appearance. For
example, crocodiles use their head in order to attract mates by doing
behavior <-무슨 행동을 하나요? or noise. This counters the writer’s claim that crests may have been used to
fascinate opposing sex.
Moreover, the lecturer goes on to say that
it is impossible for crests of Lambeosaurus to be used for combat. Crests did not extended not forward, but
backward. It means when Lambeosaurus fought with other dinosaurs, they might
not have been used crests. According to fossil fuels, crests also had were hollow inside. It is not suitable
for Lambeosaurus to fight against enemies. This challenges the writer’s argument that the crests were used for
fighting.
Lastly, the lecturer maintains that the
crests might not have been not provided Lambeosaurus with sufficient
oxygen.<- 물 안에 있을 때라는 표현을 넣어주는 편이
더 정확하겠습니다 Lambeosaurus might have been needed
tremendous oxygen, because it has had massive body. But, crests are
were too small
to offer oxygen for Lambeosaurus’s huge frame in a
short time. The lecturer thinks that it will be better to take deeply
breath out of the water. This rebuts the writer’s
viewpoint that crests were used to supply air while Lambeosaurus ate beneath water.
Writing 0–30 score scale
Fair(20-23)
내용적으로 핵심적인 부분들은 잘 포함하고있고, 읽기지문과
강연자의 의견이 잘 대조됩니다. 다만 사소한 문법 실수가 종종 있으므로 이에 주의하시면 더 좋은 에세이가
될 것으로 보입니다. 수고 많으셨습니다^^ |