▶ Your Answer :
The lecturer contends that test scores are sufficient
criteria for evaluating students’ achievement and potential. This contradicts
the reading passage’s claim that several other standards should be used for
assessing students’ ability and potential.
To begin with, the speaker argues that though class
attendance is important, students can be motivated and replenish what they
should learn in a class without attending the class. This is because students
can make up for what they missed outside the class. This casts doubt on the
claim in the reading passage that students miss vital information when they
fail to attend class.
Moreover, the lecturer maintains that participation in a
discussion or a project should not be a criterion. This is because not
knowledge but personality is the key factor that determines whether someone
attends a discussion or a project. Therefore, shy students who have knowledge
but are reluctant to participate in a discussion or a project will be
penalized. This refutes the argument made by the reading passage that class
participation should be reflected in grading.
Reading 과 lecture의 주장이 2개씩이였나요? 대개 3개인데 시간부족으로 덜 쓰신것인지
궁금합니다. 내용 정리를 끝까지 하지 못하면 감점됩니다.
주장이 3개인데 2개 하신것이라면 Fair
(17)드립니다.
주장이 2개인 문제였다면 Good (24-27)드립니다.
문제를 찾아보려고 했는데 reference가 너무 부족해서 찾지
못해서 점수 책정을 저렇게 경우에 따라 나누어서 할 수 밖에 없었습니다.
전체적으로 문법도 괜찮도 내용 정리도 괜찮습니다.
수고하셨습니다~~
|