▶ Your Answer : The reading and the lecture both about the decline in popularity of literature. The author of the reading believes that this tendency results in significantly adverse impact in various aspects. The lecturer casts doubt about the claims made in the article. She insists that there are different interpretations on this phenomenon. 불필요한 설명을 줄이고 핵심 내용만 제시할 수 있게끔 더 정리해주세요. 두 지문이 다루는 주제는 이것인데 reading이 이런 입장이고 lecture가 이유를 들어 이를 반박하고 있다, 정도로만 간단히 소개해주면 됩니다.
First of all, the author points out that only literature can produce intellectual motivation. It is mentioned that the downfall of literature means less benefits including in broadening perspectives, and attaining deep comprehension of various things. 내용을 더 간단하게 정리해주세요. 문학인구 감소가 intellectual motivation을 저해하는 결과를 낳을 수 있다고 본다, 정도로만 입장을 요약해도 충분해 보입니다. This point is challenged by the lecturer. She says that the books with other genres can be intellectually interllectually stimulating. Furthermore, she argues that oOther types of reading materials such as science can be creative and thus improve the understanding of readers. Secondly, the author contends that the decreasing readers of literature has contributed to the regression of our culture. The article notes that people rely on other methods of entertainment such as TV or music video which have too poor quality compared to literature. The lecturer rebuts this argument. She suggests that other types of media also can also be plentiful cultural resources and do not lower the level of culture. She elaborates on this by mentioning that other methods of entertainment such as movie or music has played important role in the prosperity of culture nowadays and the way our culture is considered always changes.표시한 부분도 비슷한 내용의 반복이 있으니 좀 더 간단하게 줄여주면 좋을 것 같아요. Finally, the author states that eventually the readers lacking appropriate standards would give rise to the decline in today’s writers. The article establishes that in spite of lot of accomplished writers the shortage of readers causes less investment in literature. The lecturer, on the other hand, posits that the decline of literature is not necessarily fault of audiences. She puts forth the idea that the contemporary works of literature are too difficult diffcult for ordinary readers to understand undersatnd that it is usually incomprehensible. 작가들이 줄어드는 것에 대한 내용인지 아니면 문학 수준의 후퇴에 대한 것인지 명확히 해주어야 할 것 같아요. lecture의 반박 역시 독자 감소의 원인에 대한 설명처럼 정리되어 있는데, 두 지문이 이야기하는 논점이 독자 감소에 대한 내용인지 작가/작품성 후퇴의 원인에 대한 내용인지가 분명히 정리될 필요가 있습니다.
Comment : 통합형 답안은 핵심적인 내용을 '요약'하는 것이 요구사항이므로 답안의 분량이 너무 많은 것이 감점요인이 될 수 있어요. 내용이 많아지면 응시자가 지문 내용을 정확히 파악하지 못했다는 인상을 줄 수 있으므로 두 지문이 다루고 있는 핵심 쟁점과 주장을 뒷받침하기 위해 어떤 근거를 활용하는지에 초점을 두고 내용을 요약해주는 것이 중요합니다. 같은 내용이 반복되거나 불필요한 수식어구가 들어가는 부분들을 정리해서 핵심을 잘 드러낼 수 있게끔 다듬어주세요~ 오탈자와 문법오류도 꼼꼼하게 체크해주시면 좋을 것 같아요. 수고 많으셨습니다~!
Integrated Writing Rubrics Score 3/5 A response at this level contains some important information from the lecture and conveys some relevant connection to the reading, but it is marked by one or more of the following : - Although the overall response is definitely oriented to the task, it conveys only vague, global, unclear, or somewhat imprecise connection of the points made in the lecture to points made in the reading. - The response may omit one major key point made in the lecture. - Some key points made in the lecture or the reading, or connections between the two, may be incomplete, inaccurate, or imprecise. - Errors of usage and/or grammar may be more frequent or may result in noticeably vague expressions or obscured meanings in conveying ideas and connections. |