▶ Your Answer :
While
the author of the reading passage argues that there are suggests three ways to protect
wild tortoises, the lecturer opposes the solutions dealt in the reading passage. the reading’s different views.
First
of all, the speaker argues mentions that the argument (argue & argument반복보다 다른 동사/명사를 사용하는 것이 좋습니다.) regarding wildfires seems flawed.
The lost habitats of the tortoises due to wildfires is not as convincible as it
sounds. In fact, since wildfires helps grass to grow, there would
be not enough grass the tortoises feed on without it. Moreover, the fires makes old shrubs
into a sort of fertilizer for new grass. This refutes the reading passage’s
argument that preventing wildfires keeps wild tortoises from losing their
habitats. (wildfire 단수로 tortoises 복수로 표기하면 문장에서 it/them사용이 용이합니다.)
Additionally,
the lecturer contends that the opinion related to artificial breeding is
baseless. The negative consequence of the breeding outweighs the advantage.
Although it is reasonable to raise the tortoises outside of the forest where is in
ideal conditions for caring, such places, the human-controlled environment might have
infectious diseases. Thus, the germs or virus detrimental to the tortoises can
easily spread to other tortoises. This casts doubt on the reading passage’s
assertion that wild tortoises can be safeguarded against dangerous biohazard by
moving them optimal caring sites (현재 optimal caring sites가 natural vs artificial 인 관계로 human에게로 옮긴 점을 덧붙여야 합니다.)
Finally,
the speaker asserts that the idea concerning new homes for wild tortoises looks
mistaken. The tortoises’ homing instinct tells a different story. If they are
reintroduced into different areas, they will try to return to original places
where they were born. While crossing roads (작성한 글의 crossing roads파트를 재배치했습니다), it is highly likely for the tortoises to be in
danger. This contradicts the idea
presented in the reading passage that moving wild tortoises into new homes is
an effective way to shield them from adverse environment. |